|
|
|
|
FUNDAMENTALS OF AUDITING
|
|
TYPES OF AUDIT |
EXAMPLE |
QUANTIFIABLE INFORMATION |
ESTABLISHED CRITERIA |
AVAILABLE EVIDENCE |
|
Financial Statement Audit |
Annual Audit of General Motors’ financial statements |
General Motors financial statements |
International Financial Reporting Standards |
Documents, records, and outside sources of evidence |
|
Operational Audit |
Evaluate whether the computerized payroll processing for subsidiary is operating efficiently and effectively |
Number of payroll records processed in a month, costs of the department, and number of errors made |
Company standards for efficiency and effectiveness in payroll department |
Error reports, payroll records, and payroll processing costs |
|
Compliance Audit |
Determine if bank requirements for loan continuation have been met |
Company records |
Loan agreement provisions |
Financial statements and calculations by the auditor |
FUNDAMENTALS
OF AUDITING AUDITING – AN INTRODUCTION
What are the advantages and disadvantages of auditing?
Advantages of an audit
We have seen that the need for an external audit in the case of companies arises primarily from the existence of split-up of ownership from control. There are however, certain advantages in having financial statements audited even where no statutory requirement exists for such an audit in the case of a sole-tradership, partnership, or non-profit organizations for example.
These advantages can be summarized as follows:
a) Disputes between management may be more easily settled. For instance, a partnership which has complicated profit sharing arrangements may require an independent examination of those accounts to ensure, as far as possible, an accurate assessment and distribution of the profits.
b) Major changes in ownership may be facilitated if past accounts contain an independent audit report, for instance, where two sole traders merge their business to form a new partnership.
c) Application to lenders/financial institutions for finance may be strengthened by the submission of audited accounts. However do remember that a bank, for instance, is likely to be far more concerned about the future of the business and available security, than by the past historical accounts, audited or otherwise.
d) The audit is likely to involve an in depth examination of the business and so may enable the auditor to give more constrictive advice to management on improving the efficiency of the business. Disadvantages of an audit
Like most thing in life, audits are not entirely without their disadvantages. There are two main points to make here:
b) The audit fee! Clearly the services of an auditor must be paid for. It is for this reason that few partnerships and even fewer sole traders are likely to have their accounts audited.
c) The audit involves the client’s staff and management in giving time to providing information to the auditor. Professional auditors should therefore plan their audit carefully to minimize the disruption which their work will cause.
What are the different stages of audit?
Auditing is essentially a practical task. The auditor always needs to reflect the nature of the circumstances of the entity under audit. It is unlikely that any two audit assignments will ever identical. It is however possible to identify a number of standard stages in a typical external audit. These are as follows:
- Audit appointment
- Engagement letter
- Initial planning
� Knowledge of the business
� Risk Assessment
� Internal control review (procedures)
� Control procedures (authorities/approvals/segregation of duties)
- Preparation of the audit plan
- Accounting system review
- Analytical review techniques (Compliance procedures-Application of control test procedures) like purchasing are according to the controls established.
- Considering the ways in which audit evidence can be sought
- Substantive testing (transaction level procedures)
- Reasonable assurance
- Review of the financial statements (compliance with the standards/material misstatement etc.)
- Preparation and signing of report
At the stage of considering the ways of seeking audit evidence the auditor will make a preliminary evaluation of the entity’s control system:
Fundamentals
of Auditing –ACC 311________________________________________
VU
4. If not then the auditor will be forced into a extensive substantive approach
What are the features of auditing profession?
In Pakistan auditing profession is allied with the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan (ICAP). It is an autonomous body incorporated under the Chartered Accountants Ordinance 1961.
ICAP is a regulatory body that enjoys a self regulatory status. Its affairs are run by a council which is elected by its member (Chartered Accountants).
Only those members of the ICAP are eligible of doing audit who have obtained license for the purpose, these are known are practicing members.
Management of ICAP
The President is the Chief Executive of the Institute. The administrative head of the Institute is the Executive Director/Secretary who functions under the directions of the Council, Executive Committee, The President and the Vice Presidents
The Executive Director in performance of his functions is assisted by:
· Secretary
· Director Technical Services
· Director Professional Standards Compliance
· Director Education & Training
· Director Examinations
· Regional Director North
The prime responsibilities of Executive Director include Personnel Management; Financial Management; Office Administration; Publications; Information Systems; Conducting and performing Secretarial functions for the Council and Executive Committee Meetings.
Knowing the audit profession and other services?
Auditing firms do not describe themselves as auditors. They describe themselves as Chartered Accountants. Auditing firms are composed of accountants who perform audits for their clients. They also perform other services. The small chartered accountant firms especially may spend more time on other services than on auditing.
The other services may include:
a. Writing up books of accounts (Book keeping)
b. Balancing books of accounts (Extracting trial balance)
c. Preparing final accounts
d. Tax management
e. Statutory form filling
f. Financial consultancy
g. Management and system consultancy
h. Liquidation and receivership work
i. Investigations (Fraud audit)
OBJECTIVE
AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES GOVERNING
AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Objective of an Audit:
Objective of an audit of financial statements is to enable an auditor to express an opinion whether the financial statements are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with an identified financial reporting framework (e.g. International or Local Accounting Standards).
The terms used to express the opinion are “give a true and fair view” or “present fairly in all material respects”.
Benefit of opinion
It improves credibility of financial statements.
What an opinion does not achieve? It does not provide any assurance about
i) Future viability of the entity; and
ii) Efficiency or effectiveness of management.
General Principles of an Audit:
Professional Ethics
There are a number of ethical matters that are extremely important for auditors to consider when performing their work. It is vital to the public image and credibility of the profession that the auditor is seen to be behaving in an acceptable manner in addition to actually complying with the ethical requirements.
It is important to recognize that many groups in society rely on accountant’s work, not just the shareholders on whose behalf the accountant is working. The accountant therefore has a public accountability.
In the light of this, ICAP’s ethical guidelines emphasis the following key points about the characteristics of accountants:
a) Independence:
Auditor is independent of management i.e. he is not under the control or influence of management.
b) Integrity:
Auditor is honest and is not corrupt. He is straight forward in performing his professional work
c) Objectivity:
He obtains the evidence needed to form an opinion and his opinion is based on that evidence alone. He is not subjective in forming his opinion.
d) Professional Competence and Due Care:
Auditor has attained certain professional qualification, has acquired the requisite skill and has attained the experience necessary for the audit and performs his work with planning and due diligence.
e) Confidentiality:
Auditor neither discloses the information obtained during the course of his audit without permission of his client (except when required in a court of law) nor uses that information himself.
f) Professional Behavior:
He should not only act in a professional manner but should also appear to be a professional. He should maintain his professional knowledge and skill at a level required to ensure that a client or employer receives the benefit of competent professional service based on up-to-date developments in auditing practice and relevant legislation.
g) Technical Standards:
Audit should be performed by following certain standards, international or national.
Fundamentals
of Auditing –ACC 311________________________________________
VU
International Standards on Auditing (ISAs)
The auditor should follow basic principles and essential procedures together with related guidance as contained in ISAs.
International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) are issued by the International Auditing Practices Committee (IAPC). The IAPC is a standing committee of the Council of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), which was formed in 1977 and is based in New York. IFAC has more than 150 member bodies, representing over 2 million accountants in more than 100 countries, and membership of IFAC automatically confers
The IAPC issued standards and statements on auditing and related services in order to improve the degree of uniformity of auditing practice and related services throughout the world. The IAPC works closely with its members and national standard setters in order to gain acceptance of international Standards of Auditing (ISAs). Member bodies have increasingly sought to align the national position with the international positions IFAC and the IASC have gained influence and recognition. Standard setters increasingly refer to the international position in their consultative documents as authoritative support for a particular view.
International auditing and accounting standards do not at present override local regulations. Neither IFAC nor the IASC can currently compel any organization to comply with international standards; nor are there specific sanctions where organizations claim to have complied with international standards, but have not done so.
The preface to International Standards on Auditing and Related Services (ISA 100) states that IAPC guidance fals into two categories:
� International Standards on Auditing (ISAs).
ISAs contain basic principles and essential procedures (identified in bold type black lettering), together with related guidance in the form of explanatory and other material (in plain type) including appendices.
The basic principles and essential procedures are to be understood and applied in the context of explanatory and other material that provides guidance for their application. The text of a whole standard is considered in order to understand and apply the basic principles and essential procedures.
� International Auditing Practice Statements (IAPSs).
In conducting an audit in accordance with ISAs, the auditor is also aware of and considers International Auditing Practice Statements (IAPSs) applicable to the audit engagement.
IAPSs provide practical assistance to auditors in implementing standards and promote good practice. They are not intended to have the authority of standards.
The auditor may also conduct the audit in accordance with both ISAs and auditing standards of a specific jurisdiction or country.
Professional Skepticism
The audit should be planned and performed with an attitude of professional skepticism i.e. forming an opinion only after obtaining sufficient and appropriate audit evidence instead of blindly accepting any information or explanation given by the management.
An attitude of professional skepticism means the auditor makes a critical assessment, with a questioning mind, of the validity of audit evidence obtained and is alert to audit evidence that contradicts or brings into question the reliability of documents and responses to inquiries and other information obtained from management and those charged with governance.
SCOPE OF AN AUDIT
What does it mean?
The term “scope of an audit” refers to the audit procedures that, in the auditor’s judgment and based on the ISAs, are deemed appropriate in the circumstances to achieve the objective of the audit.
�
Audit
opinion
� Reasonable assurance
� Sufficient appropriate audit evidence
� Audit procedures (based on ISAs)
Audit-Evidence:
It is obtained by applying necessary audit procedures. Audit procedures should be based on requirements of ISAs, relevant professional bodies, legislation, regulations, and the terms of the audit engagement and reporting requirements.
Auditing is concerned with the verification of accounting date and with determining the accuracy and reliability of accounting statements and reports.
Verification does not mean seeking proof or absolute certainty in connection with the data and reports being audited. It means looking for sufficient evidence depends on what experience and knowledge of contemporary auditing standards tells one is satisfactory.
An auditor obtains audit evidence regarding management’s assertions for the following areas:
a. Existence: an asset or liability exists at the Balance Sheet date. This is an obvious assertion with such items as land and buildings, stocks and others
b. Rights and obligations: an asset or liability pertains to the entity at the Balance Sheet date. This
means that the enterprise has for example ownership of an asset. Ownership as an idea is not simple
and there may be all sorts of rights and obligations connected with a given asset or liability.
c. Occurrence: a transaction or event took place which pertains to the enterprise during the relevant
period. It may be possible for false transactions (e.g. sales or purchases) to be recorded. The assertion is
that all recorded transactions actually took place.
d. Completeness: there are not unrecorded assets, liabilities, transactions or events or undisclosed items. This is important for all accounts items but is especially important for liabilities.
e. Valuation: an asset or liability is recorded at an appropriate carrying value Appropriate may mean in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the companies Act rules, Accounting Standards requirements and consistent with statements of accounting policies consistently applied.
f. Measurement: a transaction or event is recorded at the proper amount and revenue or expense allocated to the proper period.
g. Presentation and disclosure: an item is disclosed, classified and described in accordance with applicable reporting framework. For example fixed assets are subject to the Companies Ordinance rules and to IAS 16.
An example:
We will look at an item in a balance sheet, bank overdraft Rs. 10,250. In reporting this item in the balance sheet, the directors are making these assertions:
a. That there is a liability to the company’s bankers.
b. That at the balance sheet date this liability was Rs. 10,250.
c. That this amount is agreed by the bank
d. That the overdraft was repayable on demand. If this were not so, it would not appear amongst the current liabilities and terms would be stated.
e. That the overdraft was not secured. If it were secured this fact would need to be stated.
f. That the company has the Authority to borrow from its Memorandum and Articles.
g. That a bank reconciliation statement can be prepared.
h. That the bank is willing to let the overdraft continue.
If no item ‘bank overdraft’ appeared in the balance sheet, it would represent an assertion by the directors that no overdraft liability existed at the balance sheet date.
REASONABLE ASSURANCE
What is reasonable assurance?
A conclusion that the financial statements are not materially misstated. An auditor cannot obtain absolute assurance because of limitations described in Para below.
How reasonable assurance is achieved?
It is achieved by obtaining audit evidence.
Factors affecting reasonable assurance
Fundamentals
of Auditing –ACC 311______________________________________________
VU
i) Inherent limitation of an audit, i.e. failure of audit procedures to detect material misstatements in financial statements because of:
a) The use of testing (application of procedures on samples).
b) The inherent limitations of accounting and internal control system.
c) Persuasive nature of audit evidence rather than conclusive (Persuasive: one leading
to an opinion; one which causes to believe; Conclusive: final, convincing). Exercise of judgment by the auditor in gathering of evidence and drawing of conclusion. Existence of other limitations like related parties etc.
Audit Risk and Materiality
Guidance provided by ISA 200 in this matter is discussed in later chapters which specifically and exclusively discuss it.
Responsibility for the Financial Statements:
Responsibilities for preparing and presenting the financial statements are that of management. Auditor’s responsibility is to express an opinion thereon.
|
|